How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

Kathrin Gardhouse
Sep 17, 2024
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

China's Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) that come into force November 1, 2021 sets out stringent requirements for the handling, processing, and protection of personal information. Organizations operating under this law must navigate a complex landscape of obligations, including limiting data collection, ensuring data security, managing sensitive information, and responding to data breaches. Private AI’s advanced machine-learning technology can play a crucial role in helping organizations meet these compliance requirements efficiently and accurately.

Note that the requirements under PIPL can apply to organizations outside of China as well. Article 3 clarifies that PIPL applies to personal information processing outside of China under the following circumstances:

  1. Where the purpose is to provide products or services to natural persons inside the borders;
  2. Where analyzing or assessing activities of natural persons inside the [Chinese] borders;
  3. Other circumstances provided in laws or administrative regulations.

Accurate Identification and Management of Personal Information

Under PIPL, the definition of personal information is broad, covering any data related to identified or identifiable individuals, explicitly excluding anonymized information (Article 4), defined as follows:

“Anonymization” refers to the process of personal information undergoing handling to make it impossible to distinguish specific natural persons and impossible to restore.

This aligns closely with the concept of personal data under other global privacy laws, such as the GDPR, while the GDPR employs a somewhat less onerous definition of anonymized data by adding a reasonableness threshold for the re-identification assessment performed on the data.

Private AI’s machine-learning models are trained to recognize over 50 different types of personal data entities across 53 languages, including sensitive information categories as defined in Article 28 of PIPL (e.g., biometric data, health information, financial data). This capability ensures that organizations can accurately identify and manage the personal information they handle.

By providing precise identification of personal information within data sets—whether structured, semi-structured, or unstructured—Private AI enables organizations to comply with PIPL’s data minimization principle (Article 6). This principle requires that data collection and processing be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve specific purposes, prohibiting the collection of excessive personal information. With Private AI, organizations can assess whether they are collecting only the necessary data and identify areas where data can be minimized or removed altogether.

Ensuring Compliance with Data Handling and Retention Limits

PIPL mandates that personal information be retained only for the shortest period necessary to achieve the processing purpose (Article 19). Private AI’s technology can assist organizations in managing their data retention policies by identifying and categorizing personal information, making it easier to implement retention schedules and ensure compliance with PIPL’s data retention and management requirements, for example the requirement under Article 51 to implement a categorized management of personal information. With regard to the limitation of data retention, note that while PIPL does not explicitly say so, we can conclude from the definition of personal information that anonymization is equivalent to data disposition.

Moreover, when organizations need to entrust third parties with the handling of personal information (Article 21), Private AI helps ensure that the entrusted data does not exceed the scope agreed upon in the contract. This is crucial for avoiding unauthorized processing or retention of personal information by third parties. In this context, too, data anonymization supported by Private AI can be helpful, as PIPL explicitly states that third party data recipients are not permitted to retain the personal information they have received. Presumably, anonymizing the data would meet this requirement.

Handling Sensitive Personal Information

Sensitive personal information under PIPL requires additional protections and must be processed only when absolutely necessary (Article 28). Private AI’s machine learning models can detect and categorize sensitive data types, enabling organizations to apply stricter controls and obtain the necessary separate consent (Article 29). This is particularly important in sectors like healthcare, finance, and technology, where sensitive personal information is frequently processed.

Facilitating Incident Response and Data Breach Management

In the event of a data breach, PIPL requires prompt action and notification to relevant authorities and affected individuals (Article 57). Private AI’s solution can quickly identify the types of personal information involved in a breach, helping organizations assess the severity of the incident and determine whether notification obligations apply, which demand that the categories of personal information subject to the breach are identified. By ensuring that the correct information is reported, Private AI aids in the effective management of data breaches and compliance with PIPL’s incident response requirements.

Supporting Compliance with De-identification and Anonymization Requirements

PIPL distinguishes between de-identification and anonymization (Article 73), with specific requirements for each. De-identification, where personal information is processed to ensure that individuals cannot be identified without additional information, is a security measure as per Article 51, which information handlers are obliged to adopt, considering the purpose of processing, the sensitivity of the information, possible security risks, etc.

Private AI’s technology can assist in the de-identification process by identifying and removing direct identifiers, helping organizations meet the de-identification standards set forth by PIPL.

In cases where anonymization is desirable as it excludes the information from the application of PIPL, Private AI’s technology provides the first essential step, identification and removal of personal identifiers. Automating this step can save considerable time and effort, especially since the accuracy requirement is so high under PIPL. Recall that anonymization requires the data to irreversibly no longer be linkable to an individual. For it to be impossible to link an individual identify individual whose data is contained in a data set, the identification of personal identifiers in the data is crucial. Subsequently, depending on the data, an expert should be consulted to assess the re-identification risk and, where required, take further measures to ensure the high standard for anonymization is met.

Conducting Personal Information Protection Impact Assessments

PIPL requires organizations to conduct Personal Information Protection Impact Assessments in certain high-risk scenarios, such as handling sensitive personal information or transferring data abroad (Articles 55 and 56). Private AI’s detailed reports on the types and locations of personal information within data sets provide a robust foundation for these assessments, ensuring that relevant risks are identified effectively.

Conclusion

Private AI offers advanced solutions that align with the rigorous requirements of China’s PIPL. By leveraging cutting-edge machine-learning technology, organizations can accurately identify, manage, and protect personal information, ensuring compliance with key provisions of the law. Whether it’s minimizing data collection, managing sensitive information, responding to data breaches, or conducting protection impact assessments, Private AI equips organizations with the tools needed to navigate PIPL’s complex regulatory landscape effectively.

To see the tech in action, try our web demo, or get an API key to try it yourself on your own data.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT