HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Jan 23, 2024
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

In the contemporary landscape of health information technology, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule sets a national standard for the protection of individuals' medical records and other protected health information (PHI). The HIPAA Privacy Rule allows for health information to be de-identified using two methods: the Safe Harbor method, which requires the removal of certain specified identifiers, and the Expert Determination method, where a qualified expert applies statistical or scientific principles to determine whether the risk is “very low” that the information could be used, alone or in combination with other reasonably available information, by an anticipated recipient to identify an individual.We covered Safe Harbor compliance and how Private AI can help in a previous blog post and are now focusing on the role our technology can play in the expert’s determination of re-identification risks. For an informative resource covering the Expert Determination Rule front to back, clarifying questions such as who is an expert and what is “low risk” see here.

Expert Determination

Expert determination within the framework of HIPAA involves a rigorous process where a qualified expert deploys a variety of techniques to ensure the de-identification of PHI. These techniques include suppression, where specific information is omitted to prevent identification; generalization, which involves broadening or abstracting certain data elements (like age ranges or geographic locations) to make individual identification less likely; and perturbation, which introduces a controlled amount of random variation into the data to obscure original values while maintaining overall data utility. This process requires a deep understanding of both the data at hand and the broader data ecosystem. Meticulously documenting the process is also required.The expert must keep abreast of the latest advancements in re-identification techniques and data science to anticipate how datasets could be combined with external information to re-identify individuals. Given the rapid development of technology and the increasing availability of data, experts may determine that a “low risk” of re-identification only exists for a limited amount of time, after which a re-assessment is necessary.

How Private AI Can Help

Private AI's technology becomes particularly advantageous when dealing with the complexities of free text data, such as clinicians' notes, where PHI is not as straightforward to identify due to variations in language, terminology, and format. By employing sophisticated natural language processing algorithms, Private AI can discern and redact PHI from such unstructured text with a high degree of accuracy. This pre-processing is immensely beneficial to the expert determination process, as it clears the nebulous terrain of free text data, allowing the expert to apply their statistical and scientific principles to a dataset that has been efficiently sanitized of its most apparent identifiers. It is a supportive measure that enables experts to navigate the subtleties of risk assessment with more clarity, focusing their expertise on nuanced data relationships rather than overt data redaction.The integration of such technology is also beneficial in processing data across multiple languages and formats, ensuring that de-identification efforts are thorough and consistent across diverse datasets, making de-identification more accurate and scalable at the same time. Yet, the final determination of re-identification risk remains a human-driven process that requires a deep understanding of the data’s potential use cases and the availability of other information that could lead to re-identification.

Conclusion

As we navigate the complexities of health data privacy, it is beneficial to be aware of the collaboration opportunities between technology and human expertise. De-identification technologies like those developed by Private AI are instrumental in the preliminary processing of data. They are a testament to the progress in the field of privacy-enhancing technology, yet they complement rather than replace the nuanced, expert-driven process required under the HIPAA Expert Determination method. The alliance of advanced AI tools and expert judgment forms the backbone of a robust approach to PHI de-identification and the protection of individual privacy.Want to see our technology in action? Try our web demo or get an API key here.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT