How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

Kathrin Gardhouse
Sep 24, 2024
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) has set forth guidelines to ensure that Federally Regulated Financial Institutions (FIs) maintain robust data security, risk management, and operational resilience. Private AI’s advanced machine learning and natural language processing technologies provide helpful tools that can help FRFIs meet these requirements efficiently and effectively.

Since the OSFI guidelines are often high level, this article provides practical insights into how Private AI can support compliance with key OSFI guidelines, particularly B-13 Technology and Cyber Risk Management, the Integrity and Security Guideline, and the Draft Guideline E-23 Model Risk Management.

1. Data Identification, Classification, and Protection (B-13: 3.1.4 and Integrity and Security Guideline: Principle 8)

One aspect of OSFI’s B-13 Technology and Cyber Risk Management guideline mandates that FIs implement controls to identify, classify, and protect both structured and unstructured data. This process must include periodic discovery scans to detect any deviations from established standards. Classification in the cybersecurity context typically refers to "Public, Private, or Confidential” data.

Private AI’s technology excels in the identification and labelling of sensitive data across both structured and unstructured formats. Knowing which kinds of data points are and where can help with the classification of the data in accordance with internal standards.

By leveraging machine learning models trained to identify over 50 different types of personal data across 53 languages, Private AI can accurately and efficiently detect and classify sensitive information within an organization’s data repositories. Automating this basic yet critical step ensures that the very cornerstone of data management, i.e., knowing what you have and where, is done reliably and without sinking in a lot of time and effort.

For example, Private AI’s solution can detect Payment Card Industry information like bank account number, CVV, and credit card expiration even in unstructured data and in hidden places. Doing so is no easy feat in banking, where data can live within free text fields in databases, embedded files, storage buckets, and network drives with handwritten content on PDF scans, Word documents and images. The volumes, variety, and complexity of the data involved mean FIs are dealing with messy, disfluent data, OCR errors, and multilingual and multinational information.

Private AI’s flexible deployment allows developers to integrate it with continuous monitoring capabilities to allow for periodic discovery scans to automatically identify changes or deviations from the established data protection controls. This proactive approach strengthens data security but also ensures compliance with the ongoing identification and classification requirements set forth by OSFI.

2. Secure-by-Design Practices (B-13: 3.2.1)

In the same guideline, OSFI emphasizes the adoption of secure-by-design practices to safeguard technology assets, including applications, microservices, and APIs. Security controls should be preventive and applied end-to-end, starting at the design stage.

Private AI’s solutions are designed to integrate seamlessly into the development lifecycle of FIs, allowing developers to embed robust data protection measures directly into applications and services from the outset. By implementing Private AI’s API during the design and development stages, FIs can ensure that sensitive data is identified, classified, and protected even before it is ingested into the FI’s systems. This preventive approach aligns well with OSFI’s secure-by-design mandate, ensuring that data protection is an inherent part of the technology stack, rather than an afterthought.

For example, Private AI’s solution could be used to intercept incoming data streams to filter out specific personal information that the FI does not need to collect for its purposes, like the SIN number on a credit report. Unless the SIN is collected for purposes required under the law, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner advises not to collect it, and ties stringent information and consent requirements to its collection.

3. Data Protection and Loss Prevention (B-13: 3.2.5 and Integrity and Security Guideline: Principle 8)

The protection of data throughout its lifecycle—whether at rest, in transit, or in use—is a cornerstone of OSFI’s B-13 and Integrity and Security guidelines. These guidelines require FIs to design and implement risk-based controls, starting with clear information classification.

Private AI’s machine learning technology offers unparalleled accuracy in detecting and redacting sensitive information across all stages of the data lifecycle. Whether data is being stored, transferred, or actively used in processing, Private AI can automatically identify and mask sensitive information to prevent unauthorized access or leakage. This is particularly critical for data in transit, where the risk of interception is high. By integrating Private AI’s tools into existing DLP strategies, FIs can ensure that their data is continuously protected, meeting the stringent requirements of OSFI’s data protection guidelines.

4. Forensic Investigations and Root Cause Analysis (B-13: 3.4.5)

When incidents occur, OSFI requires FIs to conduct forensic investigations and root cause analyses to determine the impact and address the vulnerabilities that led to the breach.

Private AI can play a crucial role in these investigations by quickly identifying the types and extent of sensitive data involved in an incident. This capability enables FIs to assess the direct and indirect impacts more accurately and to implement targeted remediation actions. Additionally, by providing detailed reports on the data affected, Private AI assists in understanding the root causes related to data handling practices, ensuring that lessons learned are effectively integrated into future security measures.

5. Data Governance and Model Risk Management (Draft Guideline E-23: Principle 6)

OSFI’s draft Guideline E-23 highlights the interdependency between data and model risk, particularly in the context of AI/ML techniques. Organizations are required to establish policies and procedures that govern data in models, ensuring consistency with enterprise-level data governance frameworks.

Private AI’s technology supports this requirement by offering tools that enhance the privacy and fairness of data used in AI models. By detecting and redacting sensitive information before it is fed into models, Private AI helps organizations maintain the privacy of their data, reducing the risk of biased outcomes and privacy breaches. With regards to biases, the approach is this: filtering out personal information that constitutes one of the so-called “protected grounds” on the basis of which discrimination is prohibited, such as age, gender, and sexual orientation, improves the fairness of a decision-making system because it can no longer directly base its decision on such prohibited grounds. Beware, however, that AI models may be able to infer prohibited grounds from other data points that remain. Thus aligning the data composition with enterprise-level data governance ensures that AI/ML models are not only compliant with OSFI guidelines but also ethical and effective.

Conclusion

Private AI provides some of the advanced tools and technologies that FIs need to comply with OSFI’s rigorous guidelines. From data identification and classification to secure-by-design practices and robust data protection measures, Private AI helps financial institutions safeguard their data, mitigate risks, and ensure compliance across all stages of the data lifecycle. By integrating Private AI’s solutions into their technology infrastructure, FIs can meet aspects of OSFI’s standards with confidence, knowing that their data security and governance practices are both effective and future-proof.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT