Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

Apr 2, 2024
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

In today's data-driven landscape, the use of AI-based solutions, such as ChatGPT, has become increasingly prevalent. These solutions leverage the power of artificial intelligence to analyze data, generate insights, and facilitate interactions with users. However, with the rise of AI technologies, it is crucial to consider the implications for data protection and privacy, particularly in the context of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).The GDPR sets out guidelines and regulations to safeguard the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals regarding the processing of their personal data. The regulation applies to any organization that handles personal data of individuals resident in the European Union, regardless of its location. It places an emphasis on ensuring transparency, lawful processing, data subject rights, and appropriate security measures when dealing with personal data.When it comes to LLM-based solutions, GDPR compliance is of paramount importance throughout the entire life cycle. Let's dive deeper into each implementation stage to understand the implications:Prep Work: As a first step, organizations should consider conducting data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) to identify and address any potential risks associated with the deployment of their solution.Training: During the training stage, the ChatGPT model is exposed to various data sets to learn and generate responses. This process may involve the use of personal data, such as text inputs from users or customer interactions. To comply with the GDPR, organizations must ensure they have a legitimate basis for processing personal data, such as obtaining user consent or demonstrating a legitimate interest. Additionally, data minimization principles should be followed, ensuring that only relevant and necessary personal data is used for training purposes.Validation: The validation stage assesses the performance and accuracy of the LLM model. It may involve using real-world data that reflect the current processing activities, and this data may be different from the training data. Organizations must ensure that any personal data used for validation is handled in compliance with the GDPR. This includes implementing appropriate data anonymization or pseudonymization techniques to protect individual privacy and ensuring that any third-party involvement in the validation process adheres to data protection regulations.Deployment: When deploying an LLM-based solution to third parties, there are potential risks of data disclosure and privacy infringement with regard to the data the model was trained on. Some solutions may even contain examples of the training data embedded in the model logic. Organizations must assess and mitigate these risks to comply with the GDPR. Measures should be in place to protect personal data within the deployed model and prevent unauthorized access or misuse.Operation: The operational activities of an LLM-based solution may involve various forms of personal data processing, requiring adherence to GDPR principles. These activities include:

  1. Inference: When the LLM model uses data from individuals or third parties to generate responses or make inferences, e.g., predict future behaviour or intentions, organizations must ensure that the processing activities comply with GDPR requirements. This includes informing data subjects about the processing, providing options for consent, and implementing measures to secure and protect the data involved.
  2. Decision-making: Any decision made by the LLM-based solution that affects an individual is considered personal data processing under GDPR. Organizations must ensure that decisions made by the solution are fair, transparent, and that the organization can be held accountable. Data subjects should be provided with clear information about the decision-making process and their rights to challenge or seek explanation for automated decisions.
  3. Evolution: As the LLM solution evolves and learns from data subjects, organizations need to handle personal data in compliance with GDPR. They must be mindful of the fact that the initial consent provided may not cover a new use of the data. Fine-tuning the model using data from individuals may thus require obtaining additional consent or the ability to demonstrate legitimate interests. Organizations must of course also be transparent about the new data usage and provide mechanisms for data subjects to exercise their rights, such as data erasure or rectification in instances where the individual does not consent to the new use.
  4. Removal: When discontinuing the LLM service, organizations must ensure the proper removal of personal data. This includes not only deleting data from their systems but also ensuring that any distributed or centralized copies of the data are also erased. Organizations should have mechanisms in place to facilitate data portability if the data subject so requests.

OpenAI and its partner Microsoft have developed privacy-preserving solutions to aid businesses with GDPR compliance. For a deep dive into the available offerings and their security features, see our blog post OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services.

Conclusion

While AI-based solutions like LLMs offer tremendous opportunities for innovation and user engagement, organizations must navigate the complex landscape of data protection regulations. GDPR compliance throughout the stages of an LLM-based solution is not only a legal requirement but also an ethical responsibility. By prioritizing privacy, organizations can ensure that individuals' rights are respected, fostering trust, and enabling the responsible and beneficial use of AI in our increasingly connected world.A leap forward in your data protection efforts can be made by using PrivateGPT, Private AI’s tool that filters out personal information before it is submitted to the LLM and then replaces the PII in the response for a seamless user experience. This solution facilitates GDPR compliance every step of the way, allowing organizations to interact safely with LLMs. Try it free today!

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT