Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

Kathrin Gardhouse
May 13, 2024
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

The landscape of data protection and privacy has undergone significant transformations worldwide, with Quebec's Law25 emerging as a pivotal legislative piece within Canada. For many businesses, one of its most crucial aspects revolves around the transfer of personal data outside of Quebec.

Given the borderless nature of digital operations, this provision holds profound implications for businesses and organizations operating both within and outside the province. Considering in particular the fact that data is routinely hosted in cloud environments, it may not even always be obvious that the data is transferred outside of Quebec. In this article, we thus shine a light on not only the requirements to be met in cases of cross-border data transfers, but also on subservice providers businesses need to consider when determining whether the data transfer requirements apply to a particular processing activity.

Rigid Framework for Transfers

Law25 stipulates that personal data originating from Quebec cannot be transferred to a jurisdiction outside the province unless certain conditions are met. These conditions ensure that the data remains protected at a level comparable to what is offered within Quebec. For multinational companies or those using cloud-based services located outside Quebec, this demands a meticulous examination of their data storage and processing practices.

Consent and Transparency

Transparency stands at the forefront of Law25. Before any data transfer outside Quebec can occur, organizations must inform individuals about the possibility of their information being disclosed outside the province and the associated risks. This mandatory transparency enables informed decision-making on the part of the individual.

Evaluating Recipient Jurisdictions

Before transferring data, companies are required to assess the level of data protection in the recipient jurisdiction. The assessment seeks to ensure that the protections in place are substantially similar to those under Law25. This requirement can pose challenges, especially when dealing with jurisdictions with evolving or less rigid data protection regimes.

At this time, the Quebec regulator has not provided any guidance on how such a jurisdiction assessment is to be conducted. We merely know from the text of Law25 that businesses must consider the sensitivity of the information, the purpose of disclosure, the protection measures, including contractual ones, and the legal framework applicable in the recipient jurisdiction, which shall include the personal information protection principles applicable there.

One approach BLG suggested would be to use the framework provided by Quebec’s Secrétariat à la réforme des institutions démocratiques, à l’accès à l’Information et à la laïcité under the Act Respecting Access. Under this approach, the OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data serve as a list of principles against which to assess the foreign jurisdiction. BLG comments that these principles should be expanded to include an assessment of the enforceability of these principles in the recipient jurisdiction. It may further be prudent to consider the socio-economic situation to determine whether the recipient business or its employees could be enticed to sell the personal information received.

Contractual Obligations

Even if the destination jurisdiction offers robust data protection, Law25 mandates that there be a contractual agreement between the data-transferring entity and the recipient. This contract binds the recipient to offer protections equivalent to those in Quebec, ensuring the safeguarding of personal information irrespective of geographical boundaries.

Periodic Reassessment

The dynamism of data protection laws means that what may be compliant today might not be tomorrow. Law25 necessitates periodic re-assessments of recipient jurisdictions to ensure continued compliance. For businesses, this means maintaining an active awareness of global data protection developments.

Potential Business Implications

The stringent data transfer requirements might pose challenges for businesses reliant on global operations or third-party data processors outside Quebec. For example, if a Canadian business uses Salesforce, there may be a question mark behind its Law25 compliance as a result. There's an evident need to recalibrate strategies, possibly leading to increased operational costs. However, on the flip side, adhering to Law25 can also position a company as a leader in data protection, enhancing its reputation.

Conclusion

Quebec's Law25 doesn’t just represent a regional shift but echoes a global move towards robust data protection. Its provisions on data transfers outside Quebec highlight the significance of protecting personal information in an increasingly interconnected world. While challenges are evident, they are not insurmountable. With meticulous planning, informed strategies, and an unwavering commitment to privacy, organizations can navigate the complexities of Law25, ensuring the protection of data, irrespective of where it travels.

The safest strategy may, however, be to simply not transfer personal information, or to limit it to the necessary minimum. Private AI provides personal information redaction software unparalleled in accuracy. Trained to detect and redact over 50 entity types of personal information, health information, and payment card information in 52 languages, using the latest advancements in machine learning, the time-consuming work of redacting personal information with high accuracy becomes three lines of code. To see the tech in action, try our web demo, or request an API key to try it yourself on your own data.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT