What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Kathrin Gardhouse
Feb 11, 2025
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

As the world gears up for the AI Action Summit in Paris in February 2025, global policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders are turning their attention to a landmark publication: The International AI Safety Report 2025. This report, a collaborative effort by 96 AI experts from around the world, represents the most comprehensive scientific assessment to date of the risks posed by general-purpose AI—a rapidly advancing form of AI with the ability to perform a wide range of tasks.

Building on the Interim Report released in May 2024 ahead of the AI Seoul Summit, this full edition reflects the latest advancements in AI capabilities, emerging risks, and evolving mitigation strategies. The report does not propose specific policies but aims to provide scientific clarity to inform international decision-making.

Why This Report Matters

Since the Bletchley Park AI Safety Summit in November 2023, the capabilities of general-purpose AI have continued to grow. Recent breakthroughs include models with superior performance in scientific reasoning, programming, and autonomous decision-making. Many companies are now investing in AI agents—systems that can plan, execute tasks, and delegate actions independently. While these advancements unlock significant opportunities, they also raise new concerns about safety, security, and privacy.

A key theme of the report is the uncertainty surrounding AI’s trajectory. While some experts believe risks such as AI-enabled cyberattacks, large-scale job displacement, and loss of human control are years away, others caution that these challenges may arise sooner than expected. Notably, the AI company OpenAI recently shared early test results from its latest model, o3, which has demonstrated unprecedented levels of reasoning and problem-solving abilities, outperforming many human experts in select tasks. This suggests that AI capabilities may be advancing even faster than anticipated, reinforcing the need for proactive risk management.

Privacy Risks in General-Purpose AI

One of the concerns outlined in the Report is the threat that general-purpose AI poses to privacy. The report categorizes these risks into three key areas, training risks, use risks, and intentional harm risks.

1. Training Risks: Personal Data Embedded in AI Models

General-purpose AI models are trained on vast datasets collected from public sources, proprietary databases, and user interactions. This data often includes personally identifiable information (PII) and sensitive data, often without the knowledge or consent of the individuals involved.Key concerns include:

  • Memorization of training data: AI models can unintentionally retain and reproduce sensitive details, including health records, financial data, and private conversations.
  • Lack of individual control: Many AI models are trained on publicly available data that may not have been intended for large-scale AI processing, disregarding a central pillar of privacy laws, namely that individuals are supposed to remain in control of their data, steering its use with their informed consent.
  • Lack of clear deletion mechanisms: Once sensitive data is incorporated into an AI model, removing it is extremely difficult, raising questions about compliance with the right to have one’s data deleted.

The Report remarks that in sensitive fields like healthcare and finance, training on real-world data improves performance but increases the risk of privacy leaks. Efforts to reduce these risks include using anonymized or pseudonymized data, as seen with Google’s Gemini-Med, but further research is needed to assess their effectiveness. Privacy-preserving techniques and synthetic data offer potential solutions but remain technically challenging.

2. Use Risks: AI Handling Sensitive Information in Real Time

As for risks during the usage of general-purpose AI systems, the Report focuses on leaked information that is fed to the system to personalize the response. A common strategy to do so is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) that permits the access to current and personal data beyond the model’s initial training. While this enables more personalized responses in applications ranging from digital assistants to healthcare tools, it creates additional privacy risks. These risks are especially pronounced when data or insights move beyond local devices. Despite available cybersecurity measures, balancing privacy, transparency, and utility remains a key challenge, requiring both technical solutions and policy frameworks to protect user data while enabling innovation.

3. Intentional Harm Risks: AI as a Tool for Privacy Violations

Malicious actors can exploit general-purpose AI to compromise privacy at scale, using AI to enhance cyberattacks, automate surveillance, and generate fraudulent content.

Examples of misuse include:

  • AI-enhanced cybercrime: Attackers can use AI to scan breached datasets, identify high-value targets, and automate phishing attacks.
  • Deepfake and identity fraud risks: AI-generated synthetic media can be used for impersonation, misinformation, and harassment.
  • Automated tracking and surveillance: Advanced pattern recognition and image analysis allow AI to infer sensitive personal details from seemingly unrelated data points, making mass privacy violations easier.

The Report cautions that privacy harms can remain hidden for a long time given the significant time lapse between collection and use for training and deployment. On the other hand, there is currently no known high-profile leak of PII or harmful use of confidential commercial information, despite mandatory breach reporting requirements.

Technological Solutions to Mitigate AI Privacy Risks

While policy and legal frameworks play a crucial role in addressing AI privacy concerns, technical solutions are equally essential. The Report highlights several key privacy-enhancing techniques that can be applied across the AI lifecycle to mitigate these risks, including:

1. Data Minimization and Privacy-Preserving Training

  • Removing PII from training data: AI developers can pre-process datasets to eliminate PII before training. According to the Report, this is feasible but challenging, specifically highlighting the lack of clear standards. More on that later.
  • Synthetic data generation: Creating artificial, non-identifiable training data can help train AI models without exposing real user information.
  • Differential privacy: By adding mathematically calibrated noise to datasets, differential privacy techniques prevent models from memorizing individual data points while still allowing useful insights.

While such privacy techniques can protect individual privacy in AI models, they face real-world challenges. These methods often involve a "privacy-utility trade-off," where stronger privacy protections result in reduced model accuracy. This is particularly problematic for large, general-purpose AI models trained on text. Pre-training models on public data before adapting them for sensitive domains (like healthcare or finance) could provide strong privacy guarantees, but remains largely theoretical, the Report notes. Using synthetic data presents an alternative, but research shows it either maintains privacy risks when highly useful, or requires strong differential privacy—adding noise to limit learning about individual data while preserving overall patterns—leading back to the same utility trade-offs.

2. Privacy-Enhancing AI Deployment

  • On-device processing: Running AI models locally on consumer devices (rather than the cloud) reduces exposure of sensitive data to third parties.
  • Secure cloud deployment: End-to-end security solutions for data centers when handling sensitive data with larger models that can't run locally.
  • Confidential computing: Hardware-based security solutions, such as secure enclaves and encrypted computation, ensure that AI operations occur in protected environments where even the cloud provider cannot access raw data.
  • Cryptographic techniques: Methods like homomorphic encryption and zero-knowledge proofs allow AI systems to process data without revealing its contents, although these solutions remain computationally expensive.
  • User-controlled data governance: Dashboards and interfaces for managing permissions, tracking data usage, and controlling PII could be helpful to give greater effect to individual’s ownership over their data, especially when paired with data provenance systems.

3. Strengthening Security Against AI-Enabled Attacks

  • AI-driven cybersecurity tools: General-purpose AI can be leveraged to detect and neutralize threats, including phishing attacks, malware, and data breaches.
  • Liability: Holding developers and distributors accountable for malicious use, like some legal frameworks, could disincentivize unsafe deployment.

Despite these advances, privacy-enhancing technologies and effective security measures are still evolving, and many AI privacy challenges remain unresolved.

This is where Private AI fits in.

Where Private AI Fits In: Practical, Scalable Privacy Solutions

At Private AI, we specialize in privacy-enhancing AI solutions that address some of the very challenges outlined in the Report. Our technology is designed to:

  • Detect and redact PII before it enters AI training pipelines, helping developers build privacy-compliant AI models. Our high accuracy performance is capable of meeting strict de-identification standards such as those under HIPAA.
  • Protect PII in AI interactions, ensuring that sensitive information is never exposed in AI-generated outputs.
  • Enable secure AI deployment by applying automated privacy filters in real-time across structured and unstructured data.
  • Support compliance with global privacy laws, including GDPR, Quebec’s Health Privacy Law, and Japan’s APPI.

To explore how Private AI can enhance privacy protection in AI systems, try our web demo or contact us to integrate privacy-preserving AI into your workflows.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT