EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

Patricia Graciano
Feb 14, 2025
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) recently released its comprehensive Guidelines 01/2025 on Pseudonymisation, a document rich with practical insights into the application of pseudonymisation under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

While pseudonymisation is often associated with the replacement of personal identifiers, the EDPB’s guidance makes it clear that achieving effective pseudonymisation requires more than this technical step. It involves a suite of technical and organizational measures to ensure that data can no longer be attributed to individuals without additional, securely stored information. The Guideline further demonstrates the intricate relation among pseudonymization, data minimization, purpose limitation, privacy by design and default, and other GDPR requirements.

While the entire Guideline is a worthwhile read for anyone tasked with GDPR compliance in the flavor of data pseudonymization, this article highlights one particular example and fleshes out a challenge that is insufficiently featured in the Guideline, the basic and deceivingly simple step of accurately identifying and replacing personal identifiers in unstructured data.

Example: The Privacy-Preserving Dental Implant Register

Among the 10 great examples in the EDPB guidelines is one, Example 3, that showcases how a dental implant register can pseudonymise sensitive data to achieve a balance between functionality and privacy. This Register collects detailed information about dental implants to monitor quality, provide feedback to practitioners, and ensure continuity of care for patients by different practitioners. The multi-step procedure involving temporary and permanent pseudonyms as well as a designated Trust Center is impressive, demonstrating how pseudonymisation enables data to be used responsibly without compromising privacy.

However, while the guidance does a stellar job of laying out the technological and organizational measures necessary for managing lookup tables, securing data flows, and safeguarding additional information, it sidesteps a particularly thorny issue: how do you reliably identify and replace personal identifiers in the unstructured data in the first place? Unstructured data, like free-form notes, scanned medical records, or text-rich emails, is notoriously messy. Identifiers can be hidden in unexpected places, making the first step of pseudonymisation—detecting and replacing personal identifiers—far from straightforward.

What’s Going On in Example 3?

In this scenario, dentists collect patient data, including identifiers, implant details, and medical information. They send this data, tagged with temporary pseudonyms, to the Register. A Trust Centre then steps in, replacing the temporary pseudonyms with permanent ones and managing the lookup table that connects pseudonyms to patient identities. The Register, armed with this pseudonymised data, analyzes implant quality and provides aggregated feedback to practices, all while ensuring patient identities remain protected. When subsequent caregivers need access, they can request the necessary data from the Register via controlled channels.

It’s a well-orchestrated process with clear benefits, but here’s the twist: a lot of this data is likely unstructured, a difficulty the example does not surface.

The Difficulty with Unstructured Data

Unstructured data doesn’t follow neat, predefined formats. It can include patient names buried in free-text fields, operation details scattered across scanned documents, or sensitive information embedded in potentially handwritten medical notes. The guidelines don’t dive into how to tackle these messy data types, but this is where a key real-world challenge lies. Overlooking even a single identifier during pseudonymisation can weaken the process and increase the risk of non-compliance.

Private AI’s Role

This is where Private AI shines. Our technology is purpose-built to deal with unstructured data, tackling the tricky task of finding and replacing personally identifiable information (PII) with speed and precision. Here’s how we help:

  1. Spotting the Hidden: Advanced machine learning models detect personal data like names, health insurance numbers, and payment information, even when buried in free-text fields, handwritten notes, or multilingual documents.
  2. Reporting on PII: The technology can generate a detailed report on the PII contained in the data which is essential for the assessment that will guide the determination of subsequently deployed additional technical safeguards as required under GDPR. Importantly, this report can include indirect identifiers that are not supposed to be replaced with pseudonyms like medical history or diagnosis.
  3. Precision Pseudonymisation: Once identified, PII is removed or replaced with pseudonyms or placeholders, the first critical step towards proper pseudonymization.

What Else Needs to Be Done?

While Private AI can take the lead in identifying and replacing identifiers, achieving proper pseudonymisation requires additional complementary measures tailored to the specific context and pseudonymisation domain. Controllers must first define the pseudonymisation domain—determining who should be precluded from attributing data to individuals and assessing the risks posed by actors within and outside that domain. Subsequently, appropriate technological and organizational measures must be implemented, such as securely managing any lookup tables that link pseudonyms to identities and enforcing strict protocols for data flows. These steps, guided by the EDPB’s recommendations, are essential for ensuring that pseudonymisation effectively minimizes risks and upholds data protection principles.

Conclusion

For organizations grappling with the complexities of pseudonymisation, Private AI ensures they’re equipped to meet the challenge head-on, even when dealing with the messiest, most unstructured datasets. The EDPB Pseudonymization Guideline can then be consulted for clear insights into what else is required to meet the GDPR requirements of safeguarding personal data that has been stripped of personal identifiers.

To explore how Private AI can assist organizations with advanced data pseudonymization, explore our demo or contact us to test it on your own data.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT