Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Nov 21, 2023
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

67% of government agencies have increased their financial commitment to digital transformation. Long lines and endless paper documents no longer suffice - citizens now expect public services with less hassle and technology seamlessly embedded. However, this increased reliance on technology makes government agencies and institutions prime targets for cyberattacks - 30% of public sector agencies struggle with outdated technology, leading to increased cybersecurity risk. Understanding the implications of cyberattacks and enhancing cybersecurity measures is vital for protecting public sector entities and the communities they serve.Watch our webinar and learn more with Microsoft's NSO John Hewie and Private AI's CEO Patricia Thaine:Access the webinar recording The Threat of Cyber AttacksCyberattacks aim to damage or gain control or access to important documents and systems within a business or personal computer network. These attacks can take various forms, including data breaches, ransomware, Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, and more. Cybercriminals use a combination of techniques, such as malware, phishing, and social engineering, to exploit vulnerabilities in the digital infrastructure of organizations. In recent years, ransomware attacks have risen by 92 percent and password attacks have jumped by 74 percent.

Why is the public sector such a valuable target?

When it comes to cybercrime, the scale of an organization rarely matters. Cyber-attacks against state and local governments are increasing and accelerating – even before COVID-19, two-thirds of attacks targeted state and local organizations. But why is the public sector so attractive to cyber criminals?

  • Valuable Data: Government agencies often collect and store a vast amount of sensitive data, including citizens' personal information, financial records, medical data, and classified national security information, making it highly appealing to cybercriminals.
  •  
  • Limited Resources: The public sector may have limited budgets and resources allocated to cybersecurity, not to mention a cumbersome software patch and update. This leads to outdated security protocols and a lack of staff with cybersecurity expertise.
  •  
  • High Visibility: Successful cyberattacks on public sector organizations can attract significant media and public attention, making them appealing targets for cybercriminals looking to gain notoriety or influence public opinion.

Recent incidents highlighting the threat:

  • Earlier this year, an Ohio county's local library was paralyzed by a ransomware attack, rendering several vital services unavailable.
  •  
  • In a 2022 incident, the UK's Electoral Commission systems were breached, granting unauthorized access to electoral registers used for research and permissibility checks on political donations. These registers contained a treasure trove of data, including voter information spanning from 2014 to 2022.
  •  
  • Just this month, a ransomware attack targeting multiple healthcare institutions and hospitals in Ontario, Canada, resulted in stolen data being published online, as confirmed by the affected hospitals on Thursday. These incidents underscore the pressing need for enhanced cybersecurity measures in the public sector.

Consequences of Cyber Attacks in the Public Sector

For the same reasons that the public sector is appealing to cyber criminals, the consequences of cyberattacks can be particularly severe. Cyberattacks can disrupt essential public services such as healthcare, transportation, and emergency response systems, jeopardizing the safety and well-being of citizens. Additionally, rebuilding systems, recovering lost data, and addressing the aftermath of a cyberattack can lead to significant financial losses for government agencies.Public sector entities that fall victim to cyberattacks can suffer a loss of credibility, potentially leading to reduced public trust. When sensitive citizen information, including personal and financial data, is breached, it can lead to identity theft and financial fraud, eroding public trust.Lastly, depending on the government agency attacked and the amount of information stolen, the attack can compromise national security, potentially exposing classified information and defense strategies.

Typical Cybersecurity Measures and Their Limitations

Government agencies employ various cybersecurity measures to safeguard their digital infrastructure, including firewalls, antivirus software, intrusion detection systems, and employee training. However, just as technology evolved, cyber threats are evolving with it. Traditional cybersecurity measures may not be adequately equipped to detect and prevent sophisticated attacks.Furthermore, many public sector agencies rely on third-party vendors for services and software, opening yet another door that can be cybercriminals.

Suggesting Better Cybersecurity Measures

In order to mitigate the risks associated with cyberattacks in the public sector, it's crucial to adopt more robust measures. According to Microsoft’s Digital Defense Report 2023, basic security hygiene protects against a great deal of attacks. The key steps to reinforce this security hygiene are:

  • Enabling multifactor authentication (MFA): provides extra resilience for identities.
  •  
  • Apply Zero-trust principles: No entity, whether inside or outside the organization, should be trusted by default. Access controls should be based on strict verification and authorization.
  •  
  • Use extended detection and response (XDR) and antimalware: Implement software to detect and automatically block attacks and provide insights to the security operations software.
  •  
  • Keep the systems up to date: Unpatched and out-of-date systems are a key reason many organizations fall victim to an attack.
  •  
  • Protect data: Knowing your important data, where it is located, and whether the right defenses are implemented is crucial to implementing the appropriate protection.

However, we need to fill the gap. Knowing where your important data is stored and protecting it is the first step. Removing any unnecessary personal data from your data sets is where you safeguard the remaining percentile.When you redact personal data that serves no purpose, you proactively strengthen your data security. In the event of a data breach, none of that data is exposed, ensuring it remains beyond the reach of malicious actors.Surely, the process of data identification and redaction can be demanding, particularly when dealing with unstructured data. Conventional approaches often fall short, being both slow and prone to inaccuracies. Fortunately, technological advancements are on our side. By harnessing the power of AI to identify and remove personal data from your datasets, you can rest assured that the elusive 1% of your data remains safe, even if someone manages to bypass your security safeguards.

Conclusion

Public sector entities are alluring targets for cyberattacks due to the valuable data they store, limited resources, and high visibility. These attacks can disrupt essential services, erode public trust, and compromise sensitive information.To address these threats, traditional cybersecurity measures are not cutting it. Government agencies should implement robust cybersecurity measures, such as multifactor authentication, zero-trust principles, extended detection and response (XDR), and regular system updates. Additionally, to ensure the protection of personal information - even in the event of a breach - it’s imperative to identify and redact unnecessary personal data.Watch our webinar and learn more with Microsoft's NSO John Hewie and Private AI's CEO Patricia Thaine:Access the Cybersecurity in Government WebinarLearn MoreRead the 2023 Microsoft Digital Defense ReportLearn How Microsoft Enables Comprehensive Security in the Era of AIWatch the Webinar on Unlocking the Future of Cybersecurity & AIVisit the Public Sector Center of Expertise Cybersecurity Collection

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT