Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Nov 16, 2023
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

Quebec's commitment to modernizing its data protection measures is evident in the provisions of Law25, the most important provisions of which came into effect on September 22, 2023. A significant component of this new legislation is the requirement for private companies to conduct Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs). While already mandatory in certain circumstances for public institutions in Canada, Law25 now also mandates the private sector to engage in a thorough assessment of privacy risks associated with certain personal information handling practices. PIAs serve as a systematic evaluation tool, ensuring that projects or initiatives involving personal data are in line with the law's rigorous privacy standards.Along with the coming into force of relevant provisions of Law25 itself, the Quebec privacy regulator, Commission d'accès à l'information du Québec (“CAI”), published a comprehensive Companion Guide for conducting PIAs on September 21, 2023. They also included a template, only available in French. This can be easily translated( e.g., using DeepL); however, the customization of the document is then limited. If you find yourself restricted by the dropdown options the CAI provided, for example because you want your template to cover other legislations, you can download Private AI’s much more customizable version here (download will begin automatically).

When is a PIA Required?

Law25 mandates businesses to “conduct an assessment of the privacy-related factors of any project of acquisition, development and redesign of an information system or electronic service delivery involving the collection, use, communication, keeping or destruction of personal information.” (Section 3.3.) In other words, PIAs are required for a broad range of projects involving personal information, both in the implementation stage as well as before significant changes are made.In addition, a PIA is also required when personal information is proposed to be disclosed outside of Quebec. (Section 17.)

Components of a PIA Law25

The CAI’s guidance suggests the following steps to go through during the PIA:

Project description and scope

Describing the project, its territorial and temporal scope, the situation that gave rise to it, as well as its objectives provides the foundation of the PIA.

Roles and responsibilities

Setting out who is responsible for conducting, consulting on, and approving the PIA within or outside of the organization may vary depending on the project. Clarifying these roles and responsibilities assures that the relevant expertise went into the PIA.

Personal information involved and scope of assessment

The next step of every PIA should be the identification of the personal information that is involved, as well as the kind of processing it will be subjected to (collection, use, creation, inferences, disclosure, etc.). It will also be informative to determine the sensitivity level of the personal information, which can differ depending on the kind and volume of personal information as well as the proposed data recipient, if any. Noting the source of the personal information will also be informative for the following determination of any consent requirements, because by default, personal information should be collected from the individuals themselves.This section also includes determining the purpose for processing, the means of collection, use, disclosing, and destroying the information, as well as details on the storage location. The last point is important as a jurisdiction assessment will have to follow if the data is communicated outside of Quebec. For details see our blog post “Law25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec.”The CAI also suggests to include the individuals, internally as well as externally, that will have access to the personal information, and why this is necessary.On the basis of the details gathered here, a justification of the scope of the PIA should follow, for example, internal procedures, hosting offerings of customer data, employee confidentiality agreements, system infrastructure, etc.

Compliance with privacy obligations and principles

Next should follow a thorough examination to ensure that all data activities are in line with the stipulations of Law25 and other applicable laws. As mentioned, this will involve consent requirements, but also whether data minimization principles have been met and whether the security measures in place are adequate for the proposed processing, considering the sensitivity of the personal information as well as the overall risk to which the project exposes the data. The CAI proposes to indicate the exact legislative provision that is relevant here and the measures taken to meet the stipulated requirement.

Identification of risks and mitigation strategies

This section of the PIA should describe the privacy risks generated by the assessed project and the consequences for the individuals concerned. It should also present the strategies put in place to eliminate or mitigate these risks, as well as an analysis of the effect of these measures on the residual level of risk. The CAI proposes to assess the risk separately for the collection, use, disposition, and disclosure of personal information.

Action plan

The action plan that follows the conclusion of the PIA should include a strategy to implement the new risk mitigation strategies identified, including responsible individuals and completion date.

Approval of the report and versions

The CAI’s template next provides for an approval signature, for links to attached documents, and evaluation update logging. A PIA isn't a one-off task. Given the evolving nature of technology and data practices, PIAs should be periodically revisited and updated. This ensures that any new challenges or risks that emerge as the project progresses are addressed promptly.

Conclusion

The introduction of mandatory PIAs under Law25 underscores Quebec's commitment to fostering a proactive approach to data protection. Rather than being viewed as a regulatory hurdle, PIAs should be embraced as strategic tools, helping organizations to preemptively address privacy concerns. In the age of digital transformation, where personal data is both a valuable asset and a potential vulnerability, a thorough PIA process becomes an essential beacon, guiding entities towards responsible and compliant data practices. Instantly download our PIA template here.Depending on the project to be assessed, Private AI’s personal information detection technology can support Step 3, above, as well as risk mitigation in Step 5. Sometimes you will have to identify the existing personal information in your systems or a data set, and that can be a daunting task if your business processes a lot of data, especially unstructured data. This task can be reduced to implementing three lines code, and in no time you will have state-of-the-art AI-driven technology scan and report on your data. If you realize throughout your PIA that not all the personal information is actually required for the objective to be met, you need to fulfill your data minimization obligations, and Private AI can help you with that too. Our tech can detect over 50 entities of personal information in over 52 languages and replace it with synthetic data or simply redact the personal identifiers. Try it on your own data using our web demo, or get a free API key.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT