Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

Kathrin Gardhouse
Jun 27, 2024
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

Personally identifiable information (PII) is any data that can be used to identify an individual directly or indirectly, such as their name, social security number, date of birth, gender, ZIP code, and more. If this information falls into the wrong hands, it can lead to identity theft, financial fraud, and other forms of harm to individuals. Therefore, it is crucial to protect PII from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure. But who is responsible for protecting PII? There are several parties responsible for protecting PII, including individuals, organizations, and governments.

Individuals

At the individual level, individuals have a responsibility to protect their own PII. This includes taking steps to keep personal information confidential, such as using strong passwords, not sharing login credentials, and being cautious about the information they share online or with third parties. Individuals should also monitor their financial accounts, credit reports, and other sources of personal information regularly to detect any unauthorized access or use of their PII.

The responsibilities of individuals do not constitute legal obligations, in contrast to those of private organizations and governments. It is rather a matter of protecting one’s own interests that should encourage individuals to practice digital hygiene.

Organizations

At the organizational level, businesses, government agencies, and other entities that collect or process PII have a responsibility to protect it from unauthorized access, use, and disclosure. Organizations can do this by implementing data security measures, such as access controls, encryption, and data backups to safeguard PII. They should also have clear policies and procedures in place for handling PII, such as data retention and disposal policies, and provide regular training to employees on how to protect PII.

Within an organization, there are typically several roles responsible for protecting the PII of its customers and employees. By having clear roles and responsibilities for protecting PII, organizations can minimize the risk and cost of data breaches and maintain the trust of their customers and employees.

The first line of defense is often the customer-facing employees, such as salespeople or customer service representatives, as well as HR professionals, who collect and handle PII on a regular basis. These employees should receive regular training on how to properly handle and protect PII, including how to detect and respond to potential breaches. The IT department is also critical in protecting PII, as they are responsible for securing computer networks and systems, implementing security controls, and ensuring that employees are using secure communication channels when transmitting PII. The legal or privacy department is another important stakeholder in PII protection, as they can help develop policies and procedures to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations, and provide guidance in the event of a breach. Finally, senior management and the board of directors are ultimately responsible for ensuring that the organization has adequate resources and processes in place to protect PII, and for making decisions on risk management and cybersecurity investments.

Under the GDPR, certain organizations must also designate an expert Data Protection Officer (DPO) who reports to the highest management level of the organization. While the DPO performs many important tasks related to data privacy protection, they are not personally liable for data protection compliance.

In the United States, the responsibility for protecting PII is also enshrined in several laws and regulations. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) require healthcare providers and financial institutions, respectively, to protect PII from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure.

Another important regulation that concerns PII protection is the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The GDPR applies to any organization that collects or processes the personal data of EU residents, regardless of where the organization is located. The GDPR requires organizations to obtain individuals’ consent before collecting or processing their personal data, to implement technical and organizational measures to protect the data, and to provide individuals with certain rights, such as the right to access and correct their data.

Governments

Finally, governments also have a responsibility to protect PII, particularly in the context of national security and law enforcement. However, this responsibility must be balanced against other competing interests, such as the need to prevent terrorism or investigate crimes. Therefore, governments must strike a delicate balance between protecting PII and preserving national security or public safety.

Many countries have laws in place that deal specifically with data privacy in the public sector. The U.S. Privacy Act of 1974, for example, regulates the collection, use, and dissemination of PII by federal agencies. It requires agencies to protect PII from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure, and to provide individuals with access to their own PII and the ability to correct any inaccuracies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, protecting PII is a shared responsibility that involves individuals, organizations, and governments. Individuals must take steps to protect their own PII, while organizations must implement data security measures and policies to safeguard PII. Governments must also regulate the collection and processing of PII and balance the need for PII protection with other competing interests.

With Private AI, organizations can easily identify and remove PII from data in 49 languages. Using the latest advancements in Machine Learning, the time to identify and categorize your data can be minimized and compliance facilitated. To see the tech in action, try our web demo, or request an API key to try it yourself on your own data.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT