Data Protection Regulations NLP Teams should Watch for in 2022

Jan 17, 2022
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

Natural Language Processing (NLP) teams need to stay up to date with the latest data protection regulations when training their models with user data. Not only do customers continue to demand privacy, but according to the GDPR they must give positive consent for their personally identifiable information (PII) to be used in training NLP models. Additionally, data must be free of any unnecessary personal information, detailed records kept of where personal data is stored, and measures are needed to ensure that machine learning models cannot leak data or enable reverse-engineering outputs or weights (a common concern with any language model) when in production.

While many companies are aware of the requirements for the GDPR, CCPA, POPIA (South Africa), and LGDP (Brazil), it’s difficult to keep track of every upcoming data protection regulation and the regular changes to the current regulations. Even figuring out whether they even affect one’s business can be painful. Do they apply to a region’s citizens worldwide, like the GDPR and Thailand’s PDPA? Do they only apply to businesses that surpass a threshold of data collected from residents of a state, like the CPRA? Have they been amended to remove any such threshold and only apply to data subjects physically located in the region in question, like Japan’s APPI amendment?

Here’s what to keep an eye out for 2022:

  1. California Privacy Rights Act (United States)
  2. Act on the Protection of Personal Information Amendments (Japan)
  3. Shenzhen Special Economic Zone Data Regulation (China)
  4. Personal Data Protection Act (Thailand)

California & the CPRA

The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), that takes effect on January 1st, 2023, will apply to information collected after January 1st, 2022. A few highlights from The Complete Guide to California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) on how the CPRA enhances the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) are:

  • New categories of sensitive data were added, including: SSN, driver’s license, state ID, passport number, login credentials (e.g., passwords), precise geolocation, racial/ethnic origin, religious beliefs, union membership, content of messages, genetic and biometric data, medical data, sex life, and sexual orientation. Consumers must have a clear option to limit the use or opt out of having their sensitive information be used by a business.
  • Consent should be “a freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous indication of the consumer’s intent.”
  • Consumers must have the option to not have their personal information shared with third parties (e.g., advertisers) and must have the ability to opt out of having that data be shared.
  • Consumers must have the option to opt out of automated decision-making. Automated decision-making will have to be explainable.
  • Consumers must be informed about the length of retention of their personal data and have the right to request deletion or correction of their data.
  • Data minimization becomes a requirement, with businesses only being allowed to collect the necessary personal data and only hold onto it for the necessary amount of time.
  • Like the CCPA, the CPRA applies to businesses who: 1) had a gross annual revenue of $25 million or more in the previous year; 2) buy, receive, or sell personal information of 100,000+ California residents, households, or devices; or 3) derive 50% or more of their annual revenue from selling or sharing California residents’ personal information (as described in California’s Office of the Attorney General’s site).
Data Protection Regulations - Private AI

Japan & the APPI

Amendments to the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) in Japan are taking effect on April 1st, 2022. These amendments include:

  • The need to explicitly mention the purposes for which personal data will be used, along with the need to provide detailed information if personal data is shared with third parties or with parties outside of Japan.
  • Information on how the data subject can exercise rights over their “retained personal data.”
  • Purposes of use also have to be specified for pseudonymized information that is linked to the original data.
  • Now applies to every Personal Information Controller in Japan (see also Japan - Data Protection Overview).

Shenzhen Local Data Regulation

Shenzhen Special Economic Zone Data Regulation will take effect January 1st, 2022. This is China’s first regional data protection regulation. Highlights include:

  • Data processors need to implement de-identification or anonymization measures for personal data, sensitive personal data, and important data which is specified by the state.
  • Data subjects can partially withdraw consent (i.e., for specific steps of the data processing, storage, and transfer pipeline).
  • The personal information of minors (13 years old or less) is considered sensitive personal data. No data profiling or ‘recommendation personalization’ is allowed for minors.
  • This regulation establishes standards for data trading platforms, which requires the protection of personal data, among other information.
  • Applies to the “data activities of natural persons, legal persons, and unincorporated organizations in the special zone” (see China: Draft Data Regulations of the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone).

Note that the Shanghai Data Regulation is in addition to China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). Other regional data protection laws are also popping up and companies processing personal data in the region should be on the alert.

Thailand

The Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) will go into effect on June 1st, 2022. Since the PDPA took quite a bit of inspiration from the GDPR, we’ll highlight their key differences:

  • Special categories of personal data are not defined in the PDPA (whereas under the GDPR there are 7 special categories, the processing of which is prohibited except under special circumstances). The PDPA does, however, require explicit consent to collect “personal data pertaining to racial, ethnic origin, political opinions, cult, religious or philosophical beliefs, sexual behaviour, criminal records, health data, disability, trade union information, genetic data, biometric data, or of any data which may affect the data subject in the same manner, as prescribed by the PDPC.”
  • The PDPA gives data subjects the right to request that their personal data be anonymised.
  • No mention of whether data subjects need to be informed of automated decision-making and profiling.
  • Applies to “all organisations that collect, use or disclose personal data in Thailand or of Thai residents, regardless of whether they are formed or recognised under Thai law, and whether they are resident or have a business presence in Thailand (see Data Protection Laws of the World).

What these data protection regulations mean for NLP teams

There’s a common thread of ‘consent’ across most data protection regulations: do data subjects know for which purposes you’re using their personal data, how long you’re storing their personal data, and with whom you’re sharing the data? But where they often differ are with regards to the rights of the data subject to request, correct, or have their data deleted, how consent should be obtained, how explicit and fragmented that consent should be, and how opting out should work.

If you’re looking for help with consent management, we’ve heard great things about Dataships.

Another recurring trend among data protection regulations is data minimization: businesses should only collect the personal data they need, and only store it while it’s actively needed - no more hoarding information to figure out a purpose afterwards.

The safest thing for organizations to do has been to follow the GDPR as the baseline for all data, but with different types of information being categorized as sensitive or not (and personally identifiable or not), it becomes draining for NLP teams to keep track of data protection regulations on top of the latest research in NLP & Machine Learning. This is what we live and breathe at Private AI, so NLP teams can take dealing with personally identifiable information off their very full plates and focus on their core products.

__

Join us for more discussions on upcoming data protection regulations on LinkedIn, Twitter, and YouTube. Or book a call to schedule a live demo and learn about how we can help with data minimization.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT