Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Nov 30, 2023
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

In the era of digital transformation, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for businesses, enabling them to automate tasks, generate insights, and improve decision-making. However, the use of these models also brings forth significant privacy challenges. Despite the inherent privacy protections in enterprise solutions like Microsoft Azure OpenAI Services, residual privacy issues persist, necessitating additional measures to ensure comprehensive data protection.

Fine-Tuning

Fine-tuning a pre-trained open-source LLM on a company's own data is often a crucial step to ensure the model's performance aligns with specific business needs. This process involves training the model on proprietary data, which can include sensitive information. A major issue arises here with personal data memorization by the AI model, which can then spew the personal data included in its training data in production. Inadvertent exposure of this information is particularly pronounced in industries such as healthcare and finance, where the exposure of personally identifiable information (PII) could have severe consequences.Fine-tuning often requires the training data to be submitted to the LLM service provider. While this approach can ensure optimal model performance, it does pose potential privacy risks, as sensitive data must leave the company's environment.However, some LLM service providers offer the option for in-house training, allowing businesses to fine-tune models on their own servers. This approach can significantly reduce the risk of data exposure, as sensitive information remains within the company's control. However, even though models like GPT-3 do not remember information between interactions, there is a risk that they could generate outputs based on sensitive details present in the training data.Despite its privacy advantages, in-house training comes with its own challenges. First, it can be computationally expensive, requiring substantial processing power and storage capacity. This can lead to increased costs, particularly for smaller businesses that may not have the necessary infrastructure in place.Second, in-house training requires a high level of expertise in machine learning and data science. Companies must have skilled personnel capable of managing the fine-tuning process, troubleshooting issues, and ensuring the model's performance meets the desired standards. This need for specialized knowledge can further increase the cost and complexity of in-house training.Additional reading: Fine Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

Workflow Integration

As businesses integrate LLMs into their workflows, they often need to share data with third parties. Even with privacy protections in place, there is a risk of data leakage during these exchanges. Furthermore, the use of LLMs in global operations introduces additional complexity, as businesses must navigate a myriad of regional and national data protection regulations. Ensuring compliance in such a diverse regulatory landscape can be a daunting task.

Private AI’s Privacy Layer

Enter Private AI, a pioneering solution that addresses these residual privacy issues head-on. Private AI's technology is designed to mitigate the privacy risks associated with both fine-tuning LLMs and integrating them into business workflows.For businesses that need to fine-tune their models, Private AI offers a robust layer of privacy protection. It leverages artificial intelligence to identify and redact PII in unstructured data across 52 languages. This means that even if sensitive data is used for fine-tuning, the risk of inadvertent exposure is significantly reduced. This feature is particularly beneficial for industries such as healthcare and finance, where the protection of PII is paramount.For in-house training, Private AI's technology can provide an additional layer of security to ensure that the training data used for fine-tuning can’t lead to output generations reproducing those data. By selectively redacting personal information from the data used for fine-tuning, businesses can ensure that their proprietary information remains secure, and that the privacy of their customers is protected. For example, if a model needs to be fine-tuned to learn medical jargon, a proprietary data set composed of medical files can be redacted to reliably filter out all personal identifiers, such as names and numerical PII, while retaining the relevant health conditions and treatment plans. Private AI supports over 50 entity types that can each be individually toggled on or off.

redaction__b4
redaction_after

Alternatively, Private AI's technology can aid in synthetic data creation, a process that generates artificial data that is statistically similar to the original data but does not contain any real-world PII. This feature is particularly beneficial for AI-driven organizations that rely on vast datasets for model training. By using synthetic data, businesses can train their models without exposing any real data, thus preserving data utility while ensuring privacy.

spd__b4
spd__aftr

When it comes to integrating LLMs into workflows, Private AI acts as a robust privacy buffer as well. Whether it's protecting data from third-party exposure or ensuring secure data exchange between clients, Private AI ensures that sensitive information is redacted in real time. This is particularly beneficial for businesses operating globally, as it helps them navigate the complex landscape of regional and national data protection regulations. If the PII is redacted, it is not shared with anybody allowing concerns around cross-border transfers to be more easily addressed.

General Privacy Compliance with Private AI

Beyond these specific applications, Private AI's technology can address a broader scope of compliance requirements. Its capabilities extend to various use cases, each designed to meet different aspects of data privacy and protection regulations.For instance, Private AI can redact existing data lakes, ranging from Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Protected Health Information (PHI), and Payment Card Information (PCI), to call transcripts. These unstructured portions of data are traditionally difficult to redact, but with Private AI, businesses can ensure comprehensive privacy protection across all data types.Private AI also serves as a redaction front-end, safeguarding private information when it needs to leave a client's environment or enter the organization’s environment coming from a client concerned about sharing personal information. In essence, it acts as a privacy shield, removing or redacting any non-essential personal information.Finally, Private AI's technology can assess privacy risk within data by identifying all types of PII and listing quantities of each. This feature is particularly useful during privacy assessments, cybersecurity breach reports, acquisitions, and more.

Conclusion

The safe use of commercial LLMs is not just about compliance; it's about fostering trust with customers and stakeholders. With solutions like Private AI, businesses can confidently navigate the digital landscape, knowing that their data privacy is in safe hands. As we continue to embrace AI and LLMs, privacy-enhancing technologies will play an increasingly crucial role in ensuring a secure and compliant digital future.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT