New Zealand's Privacy Act 2020 and How it Compares to the GDPR

Aug 3, 2023
Share this post
Sharing to FacebookSharing to LinkedInSharing to XSharing to Email

New Zealand updated its data protection law with the Privacy Act 2020, which came into force on December 1, 2020.

New Zealand updated its data protection law with the Privacy Act 2020, which came into force on December 1, 2020. This law replaces the Privacy Act 1993 and introduces some significant changes to align with international standards and best practices. In this blog post, we will explore some of the key features of the Privacy Act 2020 and compare them to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which is the main data protection law in the European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area (EEA).

What is the Privacy Act 2020?

The Privacy Act 2020 is a law that governs how organisations and businesses can collect, store, use and share personal information of individuals in New Zealand. Personal information is any information about an identifiable individual, such as name, address, email, phone number, health records, financial details, etc. The Privacy Act 2020 aims to protect the privacy rights of individuals and ensure that their personal information is handled in a fair, transparent, and secure manner.The Privacy Act 2020 is based on 13 privacy principles that set out the rules for how personal information should be collected, used, disclosed, stored, and accessed. The principles cover topics such as:

  • -  Purposefulness and lawfulness of collecting personal information;
  • -  Collection of personal information preferably from the individual concerned;
  • -  Notice and consent requirements for collecting personal information;
  • -  Security measures against loss, misuse, and disclosure;
  • -  Access and correction rights;
  • -  Assuring accuracy and quality of information before using and disclosing it;
  • -  Limits on using and retaining personal information based on necessity;
  • -  Conditions for disclosing and transferring personal information, in particular overseas;
  • -  Limiting the use of unique identifiers.

The Privacy Act 2020 also establishes the role and functions of the Privacy Commissioner, who is an independent authority that oversees the compliance with the law, investigates complaints, issues guidance, conducts audits, enforces sanctions, and promotes education and awareness.It has an outstandingly informative website with great resources, such as a section-by-section comparison of the 1993 and 2020 act, and summaries of each principle with real-life examples of the law’s application.

What is the GDPR?

The GDPR is a regulation that aims to harmonise national data privacy laws throughout the EU and the EEA. It also applies to any organisation outside the EU and the EEA that either offers goods or services to individuals in the EU or the EEA, or monitors their behaviour. The GDPR came into effect on May 25, 2018 and is considered one of the most comprehensive and strictest data protection laws in the world.The GDPR is based on seven principles that set out the rules for how personal data should be processed. Personal data is any information relating to an identified or identifiable individual, such as name, address, email, phone number, health records, financial details, etc. The principles are:

  • -  Lawfulness, fairness, and transparency of processing personal data
  • -  Purpose limitation
  • -  Data minimisation 
  • -  Accuracy and quality of personal data
  • -  Storage limitation 
  • -  Security, integrity, and confidentiality of personal data
  • -  Accountability and responsibility of data controllers and processors

The GDPR further places significant emphasis on rights of individuals to control their own data by establishing the right to access, rectify, erase, restrict, object to the processing of their personal data, and the right to data portability. In order to allow for the exercise of these rights, transparency is required from those processing personal data.It also establishes the role and functions of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), which is a body composed of representatives from national data protection authorities that oversees the consistency and cooperation among EU member states. The EDPB issues guidelines, opinions, decisions, and recommendations on various aspects of the GDPR. The GDPR also empowers national data protection authorities to enforce the law, investigate complaints, conduct audits, impose fines and sanctions, and promote education and awareness.

How do they compare?

The Privacy Act 2020 and the GDPR share some common objectives and features, such as:

  • -  Enhancing the protection of individuals' privacy rights and empowering them with more control over their personal information;
  • -  Simplifying the regulatory environment for businesses and organisations that handle personal information across borders;
  • -  Promoting transparency, accountability, and security in processing personal information; and 
  • -  Providing mechanisms for oversight, enforcement, and redress.

However, there are also some notable differences between the two laws, such as:Scope: The Privacy Act 2020 applies to any organisation that collects or holds personal information in New Zealand or transfers it outside New Zealand. There is a different act in New Zealand that applies specifically to health information and modifies several of the 13 privacy principles, and another one that regulates credit reporters. The GDPR applies to any organisation that offers goods or services to individuals in the EU or EEA or monitors their behaviour, regardless of where they are located. Article 9(4) provides for the EU member states to regulate health data as they see fit, so that the GDPR is merely a minimum standard when it comes to the processing of health data.Anonymization: New Zealand’s Privacy Act does not define the concepts of anonymized or de-identified data. However, it permits the use of personal information for secondary purposes and to be disclosed to another person or organization if it is “used in a form in which the individual concerned is not identified.” Whether this simply requires stripping the data of direct identifiers or something stricter than that is unclear. Since personal information is defined as “information about an identifiable individual,” it would stand to reason that “not identified” and not “identifiable” mean something different, because if the individual was not identifiable, the Privacy Act does not apply and no specific exception permitting secondary uses or disclosure would be required. The GDPR, on the other hand, explicitly distinguishes between pseudonymized and anonymized information, making it clear that anonymization must be irreversible and would then render the GDPR inapplicable. The GDPR further clarifies that when determining whether an individual is identifiable, “account should be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used.”Consent: The Privacy Act 2020 does not require consent (called “authorization”) as a basis for collecting or using personal information, not even for sensitive information, although the Privacy Commissioner says a higher standard of care applies to sensitive personal information. It is also one of the exceptions to the rule that information must be collected from the individual themselves, rather than from a third party, to the rule that personal information may not be used for a purpose other than those for which it was collected, and to the rule that personal information may not be disclosed to a third party and to a foreign jurisdiction. The default basis for processing of personal information is its necessity for the function the organization performs. Consent must be informed, voluntary, specific, and unambiguous. The GDPR requires consent as one of the 6 lawful bases for processing personal data. Consent must be freely given, informed, specific, unambiguous, and explicit for sensitive data.Rights: The Privacy Act 2020 provides individuals with the right to access and correct their personal information. The GDPR provides individuals with more extensive rights, such as the right to erasure (also known as the "right to be forgotten"), the right to restriction of processing, the right to data portability, and the right to object to processing.Breach notification: The Privacy Act 2020 requires organisations to notify the Privacy Commissioner and affected individuals of a privacy breach that it is reasonable to believe has caused serious harm. The GDPR requires organisations to notify the national data protection authority and affected individuals of a personal data breach that is likely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of individuals.Sanctions: The Privacy Act 2020 allows the Privacy Commissioner to issue compliance notices and impose fines up to NZD 10,000 for non-compliance. The GDPR dwarfs these fines as it allows national data protection authorities to impose fines up to EUR 20 million or 4% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, for non-compliance.

Conclusion

While the Privacy Act 2020 and the GDPR share some common objectives and features, they also have some notable differences. Organisations that operate in both New Zealand and the EU/EEA need to understand and comply with both laws. It is recommended to seek legal advice to ensure compliance with all applicable data protection laws.Private AI is well equipped to facilitate compliance by automating the categorization and de-identification of personal data (even in free text, audio, images, and documents) across 49 languages. Using the latest advancements in Machine Learning, the time-consuming work of redacting data with high accuracy becomes three lines of code. To see the tech in action,try our web demo, orrequest an API keyto try it yourself on your own data.

Data Left Behind: AI Scribes’ Promises in Healthcare

Data Left Behind: Healthcare’s Untapped Goldmine

The Future of Health Data: How New Tech is Changing the Game

Why is linguistics essential when dealing with healthcare data?

Why Health Data Strategies Fail Before They Start

Private AI to Redefine Enterprise Data Privacy and Compliance with NVIDIA

EDPB’s Pseudonymization Guideline and the Challenge of Unstructured Data

HHS’ proposed HIPAA Amendment to Strengthen Cybersecurity in Healthcare and how Private AI can Support Compliance

Japan's Health Data Anonymization Act: Enabling Large-Scale Health Research

What the International AI Safety Report 2025 has to say about Privacy Risks from General Purpose AI

Private AI 4.0: Your Data’s Potential, Protected and Unlocked

How Private AI Facilitates GDPR Compliance for AI Models: Insights from the EDPB's Latest Opinion

Navigating the New Frontier of Data Privacy: Protecting Confidential Company Information in the Age of AI

Belgium’s Data Protection Authority on the Interplay of the EU AI Act and the GDPR

Enhancing Compliance with US Privacy Regulations for the Insurance Industry Using Private AI

Navigating Compliance with Quebec’s Act Respecting Health and Social Services Information Through Private AI’s De-identification Technology

Unlocking New Levels of Accuracy in Privacy-Preserving AI with Co-Reference Resolution

Strengthened Data Protection Enforcement on the Horizon in Japan

How Private AI Can Help to Comply with Thailand's PDPA

How Private AI Can Help Financial Institutions Comply with OSFI Guidelines

The American Privacy Rights Act – The Next Generation of Privacy Laws

How Private AI Can Help with Compliance under China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

PII Redaction for Reviews Data: Ensuring Privacy Compliance when Using Review APIs

Independent Review Certifies Private AI’s PII Identification Model as Secure and Reliable

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

To Use or Not to Use AI: A Delicate Balance Between Productivity and Privacy

News from NIST: Dioptra, AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) Generative AI Profile, and How PII Identification and Redaction can Support Suggested Best Practices

Handling Personal Information by Financial Institutions in Japan – The Strict Requirements of the FSA Guidelines

日本における金融機関の個人情報の取り扱い - 金融庁ガイドラインの要件

Leveraging Private AI to Meet the EDPB’s AI Audit Checklist for GDPR-Compliant AI Systems

Who is Responsible for Protecting PII?

How Private AI can help the Public Sector to Comply with the Strengthening Cyber Security and Building Trust in the Public Sector Act, 2024

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in Japan and China

Updated OECD AI Principles to keep up with novel and increased risks from general purpose and generative AI

Is Consent Required for Processing Personal Data via LLMs?

The evolving landscape of data privacy legislation in healthcare in Germany

The CIO’s and CISO’s Guide for Proactive Reporting and DLP with Private AI and Elastic

The Evolving Landscape of Health Data Protection Laws in the United States

Comparing Privacy and Safety Concerns Around Llama 2, GPT4, and Gemini

How to Safely Redact PII from Segment Events using Destination Insert Functions and Private AI API

WHO’s AI Ethics and Governance Guidance for Large Multi-Modal Models operating in the Health Sector – Data Protection Considerations

How to Protect Confidential Corporate Information in the ChatGPT Era

Unlocking the Power of Retrieval Augmented Generation with Added Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI Tools for Legal Services

Leveraging ChatGPT and other AI tools for HR

Leveraging ChatGPT in the Banking Industry

Law 25 and Data Transfers Outside of Quebec

The Colorado and Connecticut Data Privacy Acts

Unlocking Compliance with the Japanese Data Privacy Act (APPI) using Private AI

Tokenization and Its Benefits for Data Protection

Private AI Launches Cloud API to Streamline Data Privacy

Processing of Special Categories of Data in Germany

End-to-end Privacy Management

Privacy Breach Reporting Requirements under Law25

Migrating Your Privacy Workflows from Amazon Comprehend to Private AI

A Comparison of the Approaches to Generative AI in the US and EU

Benefits of AI in Healthcare and Data Sources (Part 1)

Privacy Attacks against Data and AI Models (Part 3)

Risks of Noncompliance and Challenges around Privacy-Preserving Techniques (Part 2)

Enhancing Data Lake Security: A Guide to PII Scanning in S3 buckets

The Costs of a Data Breach in the Healthcare Sector and its Privacy Compliance Implications

Navigating GDPR Compliance in the Life Cycle of LLM-Based Solutions

What’s New in Version 3.8

How to Protect Your Business from Data Leaks: Lessons from Toyota and the Department of Home Affairs

New York's Acceptable Use of AI Policy: A Focus on Privacy Obligations

Safeguarding Personal Data in Sentiment Analysis: A Guide to PII Anonymization

Changes to South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Act to Take Effect on March 15, 2024

Australia’s Plan to Regulate High-Risk AI

How Private AI can help comply with the EU AI Act

Comment la Loi 25 Impacte l'Utilisation de ChatGPT et de l'IA en Général

Endgültiger Entwurf des Gesetzes über Künstliche Intelligenz – Datenschutzpflichten der KI-Modelle mit Allgemeinem Verwendungszweck

How Law25 Impacts the Use of ChatGPT and AI in General

Is Salesforce Law25 Compliant?

Creating De-Identified Embeddings

Exciting Updates in 3.7

EU AI Act Final Draft – Obligations of General-Purpose AI Systems relating to Data Privacy

FTC Privacy Enforcement Actions Against AI Companies

The CCPA, CPRA, and California's Evolving Data Protection Landscape

HIPAA Compliance – Expert Determination Aided by Private AI

Private AI Software As a Service Agreement

EU's Review of Canada's Data Protection Adequacy: Implications for Ongoing Privacy Reform

Acceptable Use Policy

ISO/IEC 42001: A New Standard for Ethical and Responsible AI Management

Reviewing OpenAI's 31st Jan 2024 Privacy and Business Terms Updates

Comparing OpenAI vs. Azure OpenAI Services

Quebec’s Draft Regulation Respecting the Anonymization of Personal Information

Version 3.6 Release: Enhanced Streaming, Auto Model Selection, and More in Our Data Privacy Platform

Brazil's LGPD: Anonymization, Pseudonymization, and Access Requests

LGPD do Brasil: Anonimização, Pseudonimização e Solicitações de Acesso à Informação

Canada’s Principles for Responsible, Trustworthy and Privacy-Protective Generative AI Technologies and How to Comply Using Private AI

Private AI Named One of The Most Innovative RegTech Companies by RegTech100

Data Integrity, Data Security, and the New NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Safeguarding Privacy with Commercial LLMs

Cybersecurity in the Public Sector: Protecting Vital Services

Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Requirements under Law25

Elevate Your Experience with Version 3.5

Fine-Tuning LLMs with a Focus on Privacy

GDPR in Germany: Challenges of German Data Privacy (Part 2)

Comply with US Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence using Private AI

How to Comply with EU AI Act using PrivateGPT